Best Technographic Data Providers

The October 2026 Company Index snapshot contains 10,475,340 companies carrying the E-Commerce label worldwide. 7,319,090 have ecommerce as their primary industry; the remainder carry it as an additional label.

Within this snapshot: United States, 2,693,712; United Kingdom, 591,521; Germany, 497,116. Open the country pages for company-size distributions and further segment breakdowns.

These are company-domain counts under the snapshot's industry classification, not a verified count of active storefronts or companies using Shopify. Labels overlap with product brands and retail. Do not add adjacent industry totals together or compare this number directly with Store Leads' active-store total.

Start with a concrete segment: UK sports retailers using Shopify. In DiscoLike, combine the vendor criterion with country and company-fit criteria in the same search. Use the free count call to size supported structured filters. Semantic ICP and lookalike matches require a discovery sample; review that sample before scaling.

Company record charges apply to the query results you retrieve. You do not need to retrieve the entire vendor customer list first and pay to classify it afterward. This makes the relevant intersection of ICP and vendor usage the unit of your search.

On DiscoLike Starter, a single company query returning 1,000 new records consumes $3.68 in credits: a $0.18 query fee plus $3.50 for the records. The minimum subscription is $99/month. This is retrieval pricing; it does not guarantee that every match passes your final qualification.

DiscoLike combines page-level detection with external infrastructure evidence. BuiltWith also documents infrastructure categories. Treat the scope of detection as something to evaluate against your target vendors, rather than assuming any source sees an entire internal stack.

Hiring evidence adds a different view. A tool named in a job posting may be relevant even when no external integration is visible. Conversely, a company can have observable vendor relationships without an active vacancy. Missing evidence is not proof that a technology is absent.

Select known customers, known non-matches, and new accounts from the same geography and industry. Check each provider's vendor attribution, observation date, company identity, and usable export fields. Record relevant accounts found, false matches, and review time.

For migration targeting, inspect detection history. For sales segmentation, inspect company fit. For internal tools, inspect the source context. Those tests produce a more useful buying decision than comparing raw database sizes.